In the heart of Nigeria’s ongoing economic challenges, the nation’s fuel crisis has become a focal point, sparking debates and concerns across the board. As Nigeria battles persistent fuel scarcity, skyrocketing prices, and a strained economy, recent developments surrounding the Dangote Refinery and the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) have added new layers of complexity to the situation. At the centre of this issue is the puzzling pricing model for petroleum products, which has left many Nigerians, including industry insiders, questioning the rationale behind the decisions being made.
The NNPCL’s near-monopoly over the supply, distribution, and pricing of petroleum products in Nigeria has long been a contentious issue. However, the introduction of Dangote Refinery’s products to the market was expected to bring some relief, particularly by eliminating the costs associated with importing refined petroleum products. With Dangote Refinery producing locally and paying for crude in Naira, many anticipated a significant reduction in fuel prices, given the savings on foreign exchange, shipping, and other logistical costs.
Yet, contrary to expectations, fuel prices have continued to rise, pushing inflation numbers higher and deepening the economic burden on ordinary Nigerians. The central question on the minds of many is: why is this happening?
The Puzzling Pricing Model
At the core of this dilemma is the pricing model that has emerged from the exclusive deal between Dangote Refinery and NNPCL. According to reports, Dangote Refinery has an exclusive agreement with NNPCL, granting the latter the sole rights to purchase its refined products. This arrangement has sparked concerns that the Federal Executive Council (FEC) might be called upon to set fuel prices, rather than allowing the market to determine them through competition.
The confusion deepens when considering the advantages that local refining should ostensibly bring. By receiving crude in Naira and refining it locally, Dangote Refinery should be in a position to offer its products at a lower cost, free from the dollar exchange rate fluctuations and the expenses tied to importing refined products. Yet, the price of fuel continues to climb.
Unpacking the Costs
To understand this paradox, we must first examine the cost components at play. There are two primary cost considerations:
1. The Cost of Production: This refers to what it costs Dangote Refinery to produce a litre of petroleum products. Given the local sourcing of crude and the elimination of foreign logistical expenses, this cost should, in theory, be lower than that of imported refined products.
2. The Cost of Distribution: This includes the expenses incurred by NNPCL in transporting and delivering these products to Nigerian consumers. Ideally, with reduced production costs, distribution costs should also see a decrease, further lowering the final price for consumers.
However, the current pricing model does not seem to reflect these potential savings. Instead, prices continue to rise, exacerbating the economic challenges faced by Nigerians and fueling concerns about inflation.
The Monopoly Question
A significant part of the problem lies in the exclusive agreement between Dangote Refinery and NNPCL. By positioning itself as the sole buyer of Dangote’s products, NNPCL has effectively eliminated competition in the market. This monopolistic arrangement allows NNPCL to set prices with little to no pressure to keep them low, leading to the current situation where prices continue to escalate unchecked.
In a competitive market, multiple buyers would be able to purchase refined products from Dangote, each determining their price points based on market conditions. This competition would naturally lead to more favorable prices for consumers, as companies vie for market share. Unfortunately, the current model stifles this competition, keeping prices artificially high.
The Need for a Market-Driven Approach
The idea that the FEC might need to intervene to set fuel prices raises serious concerns about the direction of Nigeria’s petroleum industry. A market-driven approach, where multiple players are allowed to compete, would likely result in lower prices and a more stable economic environment. Instead of relying on government intervention, the market should be allowed to dictate prices, encouraging efficiency and competitiveness.
Furthermore, allowing other companies to import petroleum products would introduce much-needed competition into the market, putting downward pressure on prices and preventing NNPCL from abusing its position as the sole buyer from Dangote Refinery. Such a move would benefit not only the consumers but also the broader economy, as lower fuel prices would reduce inflationary pressures and improve the overall cost of living.
Conclusion: A Call for Rational Economic Choices
Nigeria stands at a critical juncture in its economic history. The decisions made today regarding the pricing and distribution of petroleum products will have far-reaching consequences for the nation’s future. It is imperative that the stakeholders involved—Dangote Refinery, NNPCL, and the government—pause, reflect, and make choices that prioritise the welfare of all Nigerians.
The current pricing model is unsustainable and irrational, leading to daily increases in fuel costs and exacerbating the economic hardship faced by millions. To avert a looming crisis, it is essential to adopt a more competitive and market-driven approach, allowing for multiple players in the industry and ensuring that the benefits of local refining are fully realised.
The time for action is now. Nigeria cannot afford to continue down this path of escalating prices and economic instability. It is time for the oil industry to realign its strategies with the best interests of the Nigerian people, ensuring a future where fuel is not a burden but a resource that drives growth and prosperity.
Article by Nigerian Leadership Forum, a nongovernmental think tank.
Email: yes2nigeria@gmail.com
