How to Destroy a Country

How to Destroy a Country

How to Destroy a Country

FRANK HAVILAND

From time to time I dip my toe in the icy waters of mainstream political commentary, and invariably find variations on a puzzled theme: “Why are they allowing this?”, “Why can’t they stop the small boats?”, “Why does Britain feel so miserable?”. After the murder of Henry Nowak, the attempted beheading in Belfast, and the ‘random’ stabbing on a young girl in the neck, we may be reaching the point where the charitable explanations of lone wolf, mental health or political incompetence are no longer sufficient even for the mainstream. Even they can see, this looks less like a series of unfortunate events and more like design.

Of course, as an inveterate cynic, I have long argued that Britain is living through the worst kind of civil war – the one where only one side knows it is fighting. With the authorities busily engaged greasing a never-ending conveyor belt of rapey, stabby, illiterate third worlders and criminalising anyone who notices it too loudly, you have to ask yourself: what exactly would they be doing differently if they were actually trying to destroy Britain?

I’m no expert, but if I were asked to write a practical manual on how to dismantle one of the oldest, most successful, socially cohesive, high-trust nations in history, I imagine the following steps would serve rather well:

Step One: Undermine the next generation

Tell girls that, far from the trait which has protected them since the dawn of time, “toxic masculinity” is the root of all their problems. Encourage them that gender is a social construct. Train them to eschew femininity, to deny any fledgling sense of a maternal instinct, and in delaying (or preferably forgoing) motherhood, to pursue instead a fulfilling career serving the State, big tech or ‘the man’. Unironically, label this ‘feminism’.

At the same time, inform boys (especially white ones) that they are inherently problematic; that their instincts are suspect, and their behaviour unacceptable. Then express bafflement when the native birth rate collapses, the family unit stalls, and there aren’t enough young men willing to admit to patriotic feelings, let alone fight for their country. In case this is not enough, educate both sexes that it is selfish and dangerous to have children – something climate change, and the planet can ill-afford.

Lie to children that everyone is equal, and when reality stubbornly refuses to comply (particularly in terms of the crime statistics), blame the children themselves for their “white privilege”. Organise the entire curriculum (and the culture itself) around self-loathing. As reparation for their original sin of whiteness, condition the next generation to believe they are old enough to change gender, mutilate their bodies, and vote, but too young to use the internet unsupervised or take responsibility for their actions.

Once you have successfully alienated the next generation from their own biology, history and country, the real work can begin. With the natives demoralised and demographically weakened, it is time to accelerate the transformation.

Step Two: Import the problem, then excuse it

To accommodate this shortfall in the birth rate, simultaneously import millions from high-fertility third-world countries, who average four or five children each, and make it the duty of the dwindling taxpayer base to subsidise them. Bemoan the resulting demographic imbalance and the shortage of recruits for the armed forces.

Open the borders on a scale never before witnessed, thereby making meaningful assimilation impossible. Admit openly, as ISIS itself has done, that terrorists and jihadis have been sent among the migrants, a lucky dip with every dinghy! Allow convicted terrorists to stand in UK elections, and welcome Islamic extremists – not just to Britain, but to Downing Street for “counter-terrorism”talks.

Promise “safe routes” for illegals (as though the thousands crossing the English Channel each week did not suggest the route was safe enough already). Insist this will somehow make it easier to deport failed asylum claimants – the asylum claimants that are waved through at punishingly low rates of 99 percent. Any new arrivals unable to master the word “asylum” need not fear, as a coterie of UK lawyers now cater exclusively to illegals. They charge a meagre £10,000 a pop for their services, specifically how best to game the asylum system; a service the State effectively subsidises.

Having mistakenly jettisoned their copy of Debrett’s in the Channel (along with their passports), some of the newcomers may mistakenly conclude British etiquette stretches to stabbing, raping or beheading. This should immediately be excused as “mental health”, divergent “cultural norms”, or “warzone trauma”. Any murderers who erroneously make it to the criminal justice system, can be released without charge on the grounds that they are “unfit to stand trial”. This will likely be comforting to their next victims. In extreme cases where sentences are actually handed down, prison time can be sidestepped by raising the age of criminal responsibility (fortunately, most of the migrants are ‘children’ anyway) or further reduced to as little as 30 percent of the original term.

When the public begins to notice the demographic and cultural change to the landscape, label the noticing itself the real problem – or “far-right thuggery”, in the current Prime Minister’s lexicon. Install representatives of these communities in positions of authority: politicians, mayors, senior police officers, and celebrate this as “diversity”. Develop a two-tier system of policing, justice and public discourse, designed to irritate and supplant the native population. Deny the existence of Muslim rape gangs (sorry, grooming gangs) for decades ,while covering them up and smearing whistleblowers as racists. Allow parallel societies, Sharia courts and no-go areas to develop while lecturing the natives about the bigotry of British values.




(UKR)

Share this with others: