The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has lost a suit in its bid to unseat a Benue State House of Assembly member, Anthony Attah, representing Okpokwu Constituency, of his seat following his defection to the All Progressives Congress (APC).
The Federal High Court in Abuja on Tuesday dismissed the case by the opposition party, as Justice Muhammed Umar, in a judgment in suit FHC/ABJ/CS/2408/2025, held that although Attah did not deny defecting from the PDP to the APC, the court could not assume the constitutional powers vested in the Speaker and the Benue State House of Assembly to declare his seat vacant.
The PDP had dragged the Independent National Electoral Commission, the APC and Attah, to court asking it to determine, among other issues, whether votes cast for the party could be transferred to another political party after a legislator defects.
The party also sought declarations that Attah’s continued occupation of the seat after his defection was unlawful, that all legislative actions taken since his defection were null and void, and that he should refund salaries and other privileges received after leaving the PDP.
In the judgment, Justice Umar observed that the plaintiff’s case “borders on the defection of the third defendant who won the election… under the plaintiff” and noted that “the third defendant did not deny his defection to the second defendant.”
The judge, however, held that the constitutional procedure for declaring the seat vacant had not been completed.
“The announcement of the defection of the 3rd defendant from the plaintiff to the 2nd defendant is not enough,” the judge clarified
Justice Umar also explained that under Section 109 of the 1999 Constitution, the House of Assembly must first declare the seat vacant, after which the Speaker is required to communicate the vacancy to INEC for the conduct of a bye-election.
He held that “unless and until this is done, the 1st defendant cannot act,” adding, “Therefore, this court cannot usurp the powers of the Speaker or the honourable members of the House of Assembly.”
The judge also rejected the preliminary objection challenging the competence of the suit, holding that the originating summons disclosed a reasonable cause of action.
Justice Umar dismissed the substantive suit, concluding, “On the whole, this application has no value, and it is hereby dismissed.”
(Ripples)