And It’s Now Within The Overton Window
IAIN HUNTER
I haven’t posted anything here for a while because I’ve been ‘playing’ on freespeechbacklash.com (FSB). On 28th July the site owner and editor Tom Armstrong published an article with the title Ethno-Nationalism Would Destroy Britain. The article opened by averring that Britain has changed a great deal in the last few decades. That would infer that it is something organic that has just happened to Britain without any conscious action on the part of those who pretend to govern us. It adds that people think mass immigration has radically altered towns and cities to the point where some no longer feel in any way British. Many people look back and wish it had never happened and they think that the country has been demographically transformed too fast. Very many of us didn’t want it to be demographically transformed at all, never mind too fast.
As a writer of articles for FSB and volunteer curator of the site’s Library I didn’t think I could let this pass without a reply, so I wrote one in response in which I stated that Britain hadn’t changed, rather it had BEEN changed and that the change was deliberate and without reference to the wishes and feelings of the broad mass of the British people whose ancestral home this is.
This is the meat of that response with some additions and amendments to bring it up to date.
What has been done to us, and continues to be done to us at an increasing rate, is deliberate policy handed down to the regime that runs Britain from the UN/WEF and associated NGOs and ‘think-tanks’. That cannot be denied. It is also in violation of the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Article 8 which it seems applies to everyone except the white European peoples.
Before getting into it we need to define terms. There are now two different sides to nationalism – civic nationalism and ethno-nationalism. The former is multi-racial and multi-cultural, created by the globalists. Under this idea anyone can be British if they come here, accept “British values” and successfully apply for British citizenship. It means that a tribesman from the Hindu-kush can step off a dinghy onto an RNLI lifeboat, be landed at Dover, claim asylum, be accepted and after a few years, bingo, he can apply for citizenship and become as British as I am. Before we know it, he’ll be off down the pub, joining the badminton club and litter-picking on the village green with the rest of us. This is nonsense.
The idea of civic nationalism has clearly been created to water down real nationalism which has now been given the name ethno-nationalism. I don’t much like the term, preferring that it would remain straight forward nationalism, but for the sake of the argument I’ll use it.
The next term to understand is what is meant by “Britain” and “British”? “Britain” is the whole of the main island of our archipelago which once was Britannia to the Romans and Prydein to the natives. The natives were collectively the Britanni or the Priteni although they would have been identified more by their tribes such as Deceangli, Votadini or Ordovices. They still exist, though much watered down by intermingling with later arrivals over the last two millennia. These days they are called Welsh, Cornish, Cumbrian and Scottish.
Layered over the natives were the major Roman, Anglo-Saxon, Jutish, Viking, Norman and Irish invasions and migrations all of which have contributed to the creation of the modern English, Scottish, Welsh and Irish over two thousand years. The Kingdoms of England and Scotland have existed for over 1,100 years while Wales, on the other hand, has never been an independent, united political entity.
There have been small more recent admixtures such as the Flemish, Balts, Huguenots and some Dutch, Germans and Italians plus sundry others. All have been absorbed into the whole to create English, Scottish, Welsh and Irish ethnicities. An intriguing fact is that modern genetic research has shown that, contrary to traditional belief, the Anglo-Saxons did not ethnically cleanse the area now known as England. There seems to have been considerable inter-marriage and, as a result, the modern English are much more Brythonic Celtic than they imagine themselves to be. Some even carry genetic markers identifying them with the pre-Celtic peoples who first migrated to these islands via Doggerland when the last ice sheet retreated. Cheddar man has been shown to have living descendants.
There still exists then, although diluted, an ethnic British identity which is at its strongest in the Celtic nations and regions of Britain. For centuries, it had been submerged under the English, Scottish and Welsh identities which are more recent creations but, exist it does, despite many of the people of Scotland and Wales, and even many English people, refusing to see themselves as British.
That identity has been stolen and given away by the British state which has existed since the 1688 ‘Glorious Revolution’ and the 1707 Acts of Union. It has turned it in modern times into an administrative identity which has no bearing on the ethnic origins of any individual subject of His Majesty. Anyone can be British according to current government policy but since an ancient British ethnicity does exist they can only been seen as ‘paper Brits’.
On the other hand, not anyone can be English, Scottish, Welsh or Irish. Those are clear ethnic identities, regardless of what Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood who claims to be English may think. At least, they are until the state attempts to change matters which is something that must be vigorously resisted. If I had been born in India during the British Raj would I be Indian? No, of course not. Likewise, an Indian born in England does not become English any more than an Indian elephant born in an English zoo becomes an English elephant.
We should be under no illusions about the nature of the British government, or the “Yookay” government as it has become known. It does not serve the indigenous British, nor even much care for us except as tax-payers. It views us as mere economic units while serving the interests of the international banking cabal which has controlled it since 1688. Through money created as interest-bearing debt, inflation and ever-increasing taxes it has systematically robbed us of the full fruits of our labour. And now it is robbing us of our birthright as it connives with globalist oligarchs to create a one world communist government (or fascist, take your pick). Its state security services are not there to ‘keep us safe’. With their origins in the East India company, they are there to keep the interests of the City of London safe, while keeping an eye and ear on us. The British state is the enemy of the British peoples. We can see that clearly. Why should we care if it is destroyed?
The plight of the indigenous people of Britain is serious. We have learned recently from the Office of National Statistics that among white British peoples, the number of deaths now exceeds the number of births, and this is now a permanent trend if nothing is done. We are beginning to die out. By 2031, more than 50% of the births in Britain will be to non-indigenous parents while there will be a steady reduction in our numbers. It’s baked in by the disastrous birth-rates. Meanwhile, the British government, which knows this and obsesses about economic growth yet cares nothing for the native demographics nor the spiritual and cultural health of the people, is preparing the ground for even higher rates of inward migration to replace us so that it can continue to extract ever more taxation on behalf of the oligarchs.
But here’s the thing – migrants get old, sick and infirm too. And far too many of them, especially those of a particular alien creed, do not work and pay taxes. Or they do work and, dealing only in cash, pay no tax. They are an economic burden. Therefore even more young migrants will be required to keep the benefits-go-round going. You can’t keep piling people into these islands, clogging up the roads, filling the public institutions to overflowing and covering the countryside with jerry-built new homes. What’s the population limit? 100 million? 200 million? Until the whole country is tarmacked over and built on, and we run out of energy, food and water? It would be cultural and demographic vandalism on an epic scale and it has to be stopped.
Those of us who are conservative with a small ‘c’, those of us who wish to conserve our nations, our culture and our way of life recognise that we have an unspoken duty, a contract between ourselves, those who went before us, and those who will be here after us. We have an obligation to take our country, nurture it and improve it where we can and, if we make mistakes, correct them so that we pass on to our descendants a homeland at least as healthy and prosperous as the one we were born into. Conserving our own people, our customs, traditions, culture, history and way-of-life is the very essence of conservatism and all that should lie in the body and soul of the Conservative Party. It doesn’t.
A colossal mistake has been made. It is called International Socialism, and it has been brought to us by the Fabian wolves in sheep’s clothing who have insinuated themselves everywhere, through our body politic, our civil service, our justice system, our financial system, our corporations and in even in the armed forces where ‘woke’ ideas and policies have eaten away at tradition like maggots. It is bringing us to our knees and we must correct it.
The indigenous people of Britain will have to decide what is more important to them: Their debt dependent standard of living (which is not high by American standards) and government hand-outs; or the continued existence of their race and culture in their ancestral homeland. Why? because the welfare state, which has only really been with us since 1945, now weighs so heavily on the exchequer and the taxpayer, that if nothing is changed, nothing is done to reduce the burden, if the migrations continue, national bankruptcy and the collapse of the state are guaranteed.
Some see the collapse of the state not as a catastrophe but as an opportunity to get our country back. It would be hard. It would be painful. People would suffer and many would die. There would be relentless hard work just to put a crust on the table, keep warm clothes on our backs and dry roofs over our heads. The currency would be increasingly worthless. There would be no luxuries for the many. Some of the ‘online right’, notably Gavin Boby and Nick Griffin, have outlined how they think this would go. Many migrants would leave but those who don’t will be concentrated in the large towns and cities. The native British would be in the smaller towns and countryside where they could control all the resources. By forming local trading and co-operative communities and stepping back from the system, we could rebuild in enclaves that could be drawn together over time. It would be a multi-generation recovery which might even take a century or more.
When Rupert Lowe launched Restore Britain as a political party he talked of a hard road ahead and invited people to join him in the full knowledge of that. Is this what he meant? I don’t think it is.
To prevent the state collapsing there will have to be ruthless cuts to public expenditure. Vast swathes of government activity will have to be eliminated and first to go will be the support given to migrants. That must end. No more free accommodation, free food, free smart phones, free medical and dental care and free money, free anything. All must be withdrawn. I will not go into the other cuts that will need to be made, that’s another article, but they will be both drastic and deep, making the so-called austerity years of Cameron and Osborne look like an endless bounty. At the same time the effectiveness of the police and armed forces, such as they are, will have to be maintained. They will have to be purged of Common Purpose “leaders” and bolstered by a combination of new recruitment, the call-up of reservists, calls for volunteers and the recall of recent retirees, many of whom will still be relatively young.
Whatever Rupert Lowe, Nigel Farage and ‘Tommy Robinson’ may have said about ethno-nationalism in the past will be immaterial. Their views are to the left of very many of their party members and followers, certainly Nigel Farage’s are, and they are soon going to have to face that fact. And their petty feuds and rivalries must be set aside because the future of the country as the ancestral home, fons et origo, of the English-speaking peoples is at stake. They cannot afford not to listen to ethno-nationalists and they must adopt ethno-nationalist policies if they are serious about saving the country for our descendants.
Once power has been won by a government of patriots, deportation or remigration, call it what you will, is inevitable. First to go must be all foreign criminals and all illegal migrants, including women and children. No ifs, no buts. They broke into our country so their very first act on British soil was to break our law. This may need to be done forcibly. Civil servants who object may refuse to carry out their political masters’ orders. If they do, they must be replaced. This will be just the start, for it is not so much the ‘illegals’ that are a problem but the ‘legal’ migrants and the resultant chain migration of their extended families which constitutes a vastly greater number.
In his article Tom Armstong wrote that trying to reverse the ethnic mix of the country will tear society apart, turning neighbour against neighbour. The police and courts would be overwhelmed, and foreign countries would condemn us. We would generate lasting hate. But what society does he mean? Ours has been all but destroyed by the Fabians and there is no cohesion with those who are not here to integrate anyway. Do we not already have lasting hate expressed towards us from many of them? Yes, we do. So, forgive us if, as a consequence, we say we don’t care. And what foreign countries would condemn us? Those that wish to unload their human flotsam and jetsam on our shores? Once again, you’ll have to forgive us, but we don’t care. On the contrary, I strongly suspect that among those peoples who really matter to us we would find renewed admiration and respect for at long last we would have stood up for what is ours and for our descendants’ inheritance.
He’s also worried that it deflects us from our real enemy, the globalists and their drive for a One World Communist Government. Worse still, he says, this focus on race would distract us from the true problem and risks giving them the excuse for tighter control. I don’t agree. The ‘enrichment’ was put here by the globalists; they cannot achieve their aim of destroying Britain and subjugating its people without it. Open borders mass migration is the weapon they have chosen to employ to end the British nations and it is being implemented by the ‘uniparty’ controlled by them. By attacking their weapon, we are attacking their campaign. Replacing the ‘uniparty’ government with a government of patriotic conservatives will be the first step on the road to a solution.
Tom Armstong goes on to say that the change is here and we cannot undo it by trying to make Britain white again. On this we can agree. Returning us to being the post-war 99% white British country is unachievable. People such as Steve Laws who would like to deport everyone who is not of indigenous stock are not going to achieve their dream. Restore Britain thinks so in their policy paper on mass deportations and their idea of future migration is based on sound common sense. You can read it here.
However, there must be NO doubt about whose country this is. European colonists in Africa and Asia were forced to leave as Empires ended and colonies were given independence. Since President Trump returned to office in 2025, over 600,000 illegal aliens have been deported from the USA and another 1.9 million have deported themselves – so far. In Asia, Pakistan has deported over 2.4 million Afghans so far. So it can be done. The same thing can happen here given the political will.
No one doubts that Japan is the home of the Japanese, China is for the Chinese and India is for the Indians. England is therefore the home of the English, Scotland the Scots, Wales the Welsh and Ireland the Irish. However, that is not to say that ethno-states are 100% racially pure. Ethno-nationalism doesn’t necessarily mean a nation should contain only one ethnic group. Few do, for historical reasons and because of frontier changes. Nor would Britain in the future. But the essence of it, what thinking ethno-nationalists want, is this: We the indigenous people of Britain MUST have demographic security in our own ancestral homeland. We could perhaps be happy with the 90% to 95% native British that it was 30-40 years ago. That may not be possible in the short term but in the longer term, with the right deportation, immigration, fiscal and social policies which encourage indigenous family formation, it is achievable. For the sake of our descendants, especially those yet to be born, we have to get on and do it.
Who could stay and who would go? Significant numbers of Indian and Chinese migrants have been here since the 19th Century having started to come in the 17th Century. These people are here and are a part of the nation. The Windrush generation from the Caribbean were not invited, not wanted and not needed. They did not ‘rebuild’ Britain. They came here for a better life for themselves but they and their offspring have been here for nearly three generations. We need to concern ourselves with those who have come here more recently, over the last 30 to 40 years or so, however they managed it. People who are not ethnically English, Scottish, Welsh or Irish can become fully integrated and we can be very welcoming and happy to have them – if they acculturate, assimilate and integrate fully, taking our side and accepting our history and who we are without wishing to ‘decolonise’ everything in sight or take over.
People who have settled here but still retain foreign loyalties are a big problem. Especially if they actively hate and despise us as some clearly do. We also now see an element of gloating about “reverse colonisation” and declared intentions “to take over”. They must go. There is one cultural group in particular which fits this description. – the Islamic one. Islam is not a religion; it is a political ideology of conquest which seeks to dominate in any way it can from the moment it enters a new territory. This is where we have to be absolutely ruthless. Millions must go. We are not talking about 1 or 2 million; we are talking about up to 10 million over time, maybe more.
The major migrant issue of our times is of course that of the Pakistani rape gangs. We now know that easy sex with loose white girls is being advertised to the channel migrants to encourage them to come. Britain is presented to them as an open brothel. It’s not just the prospect of the ‘freebies’ on offer. Journalists who have visited the migrants’ camps in France have heard it from them. We also know that the criminal organisations behind the small boats invasion are linked into the rash of Turkish barbers, kebab shops, vape shops and phone shops which are peppered all over our towns and larger villages.
One might think that our government is complicit because despite our having a navy and an army which could have been deployed in the channel in the earliest days, they have done nothing to stop it. In fact it is more than complicit. We have seen how they have dealt with the organised protests in Dover and Portsmouth in very recent weeks and we have heard and read the language that has been used against the protesters. We have seen the buses, tented shelters, food, fresh clothes and ‘welcome packs’ laid on for the illegal migrants. Bringing these invaders into our country is government policy.
Recently a whistle-blower has revealed that the asylum system is not just broken, it is corrupt. The migrants, none of whom retains a passport identifying where they have come from, are coached in what to say by charities and NGOs to ensure they gain acceptance and win their asylum claims. Just 1 % of asylum claimants are genuine and of the 99% who aren’t, only 7.7 % are ever rejected and sent back. The regime governing us is doing as instructed by its globalist masters and it has given us a huge and still growing organised crime headache to deal with.
Tom Armstrong says our history shows we solve problems through law and fair play, not ethnic cleansing. Well, does it not feel as if we are being ethnically cleansed in our own homeland? It does to me. Britain has never faced a situation like this before in which the nation’s governing class have not repelled invaders but instead have welcomed them. Law and fair play will not cut it, especially when the law is administered by the politically biased bunch of judges and KCs that we are at present so unfortunate to have.
After the criminals and illegals have been removed we must create a hostile environment which encourages others to leave such as the removal of benefits, the banning of halal slaughter, the banning of cousin marriage (again) and the banning of the Islamic call to prayer. Mosques where there are known to be Islamist imams should be closed and demolished. Those involved in the rape gangs, including their families and biraderi affiliates must all go. There may be resistance, there may be violence, but we have to take that risk.
We must remake the tax and benefit system, removing all traces of Fabianism so that it encourages the native British (English, Scots, Welsh and Irish), and only the native British, to marry young and have many children to get the birth-rate back up to greater than 2.1 children per couple. We actually need the birth rate to be 3 to 4 on average. It will still take the best part of a century to recover from the current baked-in decline.
A vital part of recovering our nation will be exposing the truth about who has been doing all this to us and why. We must expose not just the UN, the WEF and the EU but also the Fabian Society. We must outlaw it and ensure that neither it nor anything else like it ever has such power and influence in our country again.
Mass deportations or remigration, call it what you will, are on the political agenda and being talked about. Ethno-nationalism which achieves demographic security for the native British peoples will not destroy Britain. Of course it won’t; it is what will will save it for our descendants.
DEUS VULT
(UKR)
