PMQs 2025: Starmer and Badenoch Clash Over Historical Child Sexual Exploitation Inquiry

London, UK – The first Prime Minister’s Questions of 2025 was dominated by a fiery confrontation between Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch over historical child sexual exploitation.

The issue’s prominence has been fueled by recent social media provocations from Elon Musk, whose posts on X (formerly Twitter) have targeted Starmer with allegations and innuendos.

In a tense exchange, Badenoch pressed the Prime Minister on whether he was confident the full extent of grooming gang activity had been uncovered. Starmer responded by pointing to the findings of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA), led by Professor Alexis Jay, which published its final report in 2022. He emphasized the need for action rather than another inquiry, arguing that the focus should remain on implementing recommendations such as mandatory reporting of abuse.

Badenoch countered by questioning whether the government was doing enough to provide a complete picture of the scandal. She criticized the Prime Minister for resisting a new inquiry, accusing him of potentially fueling public fears of a “cover-up.” Starmer shot back, accusing the opposition leader of opportunism and failing to take action during her tenure in government.

Political Gambits and Social Media Backdrop

This confrontation comes against the backdrop of Musk’s relentless online commentary, which has amplified conspiracy theories and placed pressure on Starmer. The Prime Minister, however, dismissed these attacks earlier in the week, accusing Musk and others of spreading misinformation for personal gain rather than supporting victims.

For her part, Badenoch appeared to seize the moment, proposing a Conservative amendment to the government’s Children’s Wellbeing Bill that calls for a national inquiry into historical child sexual exploitation. However, critics argue that her proposal is politically motivated, designed to appease right-wing commentators and capitalize on Musk’s influence.

The Conservative Leader’s Dilemma

Badenoch’s strategy, while forceful, has opened her to accusations of inconsistency. As critics, including Nigel Farage, have pointed out, Badenoch held positions of significant influence in the previous government but did not champion a new inquiry at the time. Farage questioned why she failed to act during her tenure as Minister for Women and Equalities from 2022 to 2024.

The Prime Minister was quick to highlight this inconsistency, challenging Badenoch to provide evidence of her advocacy on the issue while in government. Badenoch’s response, referencing speeches made outside the Commons, drew jeers from government benches and underscored the precariousness of her position.

Broader Implications for the Conservative Party

Badenoch’s handling of the issue reflects broader challenges facing the Conservative Party as it grapples with declining poll numbers and the rise of Reform UK. The party’s 14 years in government have left it vulnerable to criticism over its record, and Badenoch’s recent moves appear aimed at shoring up support from disillusioned right-wing voters.

However, critics argue that Badenoch’s approach risks alienating moderates and reinforces perceptions of a party more focused on opportunistic politics than substantive reform. With Reform UK echoing similar positions on issues like historical child sexual exploitation but without the baggage of government, the Conservative leader faces a daunting uphill battle.

Starmer’s Closing Challenge

As PMQs drew to a close, Starmer urged Conservative MPs to reject their party’s amendment to the Children’s Wellbeing Bill, framing Badenoch’s proposal as a “short-sighted, misguided, bandwagon-jumping approach.”

The row over historical child sexual exploitation has exposed deep vulnerabilities within the Conservative Party while allowing Starmer to project himself as a leader focused on action and victims’ welfare. Whether Badenoch’s gambit will resonate with voters or further erode confidence in her leadership remains to be seen.

For now, it appears that the political forces stirred by Elon Musk’s interventions have left both leaders navigating treacherous waters. As the evening’s Commons vote looms, the stakes for both parties — and their leaders — could not be higher.